Friday Cat Blogging

Rascal is not happy.

Teacher who impregnated and took a student for an abortion is on the run

Here's the story at the Palm Beach Post.

Florida has a parental notification law. The teacher, Andrew Foster, is 27. The student was 17. The article claims Foster took "her to an abortion clinic and sign(ed) forms on her behalf to end the pregnancy."

Are these the parental notification forms? And if so, how could an abortion clinic believe 27-year-old Andrew Foster was this girl's father?

Let's hope they catch this guy.

Life Links 9/13/07

Jill Stanek posts a video of Stephanie Gray from the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform discussing the prolife view and some typical objections to it.


Here's a long article about the Genocide Awareness Project's display at Middle Tennessee State University and the conversation between the students and GAP volunteers. There's also mention of a pro-choice chant I hadn't heard before - "Get your ideology off of my biology!" I don't think it's quite as catchy as "Get your rosaries of my ovaries!"


Some pro-choice members of the clergy in the Chicago area got together to support Planned Parenthood's Aurora clinic. The article relays the same horrible religious pro-choice arguments we've heard before including the one which says denying women the right to have abortions is denying their moral standing.


Australian researchers have found what appear to be stem cells in women's endometrial tissue. They believe the discovery of these cells might eventually (at least 10 years) help them treat a variety of gynecological problems.


Eggs, eggs, eggs. Researchers in England are partnering with a fertility clinic to offer women a 50% discount on in-vitro fertilization if they agree to donate half of the eggs retrieved from their bodies for human cloning research. The BBC article fails to note that the cloning research doesn't produce stem cells, it produces cloned human embryos.


ABC News has a long article on human-animal hybrid cloning in Britain.

Life Links 9/12/07

FRC's blog has posted a rebuttal by Andrew Schlafly, General Counsel for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, to some of the information in a recent LA Times article on Missouri's law regulating abortion clinics.


The UK's Daily Mail has an article in which woman discuss their thoughts on their abortions. Dawn Eden notes how one of the testimonies has been removed.


The New Jersey Supreme Court needs a lesson in embryology.

Funding organizations which provide or promote abortion overseas

David Freddoso has an article on Senator Bob Casey's vote to fund groups which promote and provide abortion overseas. It seems odd to me that Casey would vote with prolifers on the funding of embryonic stem cell research but against prolifers on providing funding to abortion promoting organizations overseas.

I read some of the debate over these amendments. It was Barbara Boxer at her best. Here's a sample. She was continually referring to an 11-year-old victim of rape and how these organization can't "help" her if they want to keep getting funding. "Help" being either giving her an abortion or referring her to an abortion provider. There was also talk about how not providing funding to groups providing or promoting abortion was a free speech issue. I guess the U.S. government is violating my right to free speech by not paying me for writing on this blog. There was also mention of a girl from Nepal named Min Min Lama who was arrested and imprisoned after a relative secretly gave her (without Min Min's knowledge according to the BBC story above) a drug to cause an abortion. It was asserted that a Nepalese family planning organization couldn't work to have the girl released until they decided to discontinue getting U.S. funds. This, of course, makes no sense since trying to get a teenage girl who was forcibly aborted released from prison isn't providing or promoting abortion. The family planning agency (which was associated with the International Planned Parenthood Federation) was actually interested in lobbying the government to get rid of Nepal's law against abortion.

Boxer has used these same poor arguments before. I guess a lot of senators just recycle the exact same arguments they make every year the issue gets debated.

Some abortion advocates really don't like to see abortion

The Genocide Awareness Project has returned to Middle Tennessee State and the blog of the Tennessee Guerrilla Women isn't happy about it, calling the group "misogynistic," "deceptive" and "secretive" while claiming their display has "lots of fake blood and phoney photos."

LifeLinks 9/11/07

Yuval Levin raises some interesting points regarding the fire in the fertility clinic argument and those who make it.


Mandy Oaklander has an article at New America Media about how some couples from India will travel to a fertility clinic in the United States to insure they get a child of a certain sex. The clinic uses some of its advertising budget to advertise to ethnic media and offers pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a tool to eliminate embryos of the wrong sex. According to the medical director of the gender selection program, 90% of his Indian clients request boys.


The court case on Missouri law regulating abortion clinic continues. The LA Times also covered this story.


Researchers at UCSF have supposedly improved on Shinya Yamanaka's technique of turning adult mouse cells into pluripotent stem cells.

Father Thomas Berg on StemLifeLine

He writes,

The website, it must be said, is almost too much to believe. Is there really a market for parents to destroy some of their own offspring — the siblings to their own born children — for personal gain? My first reaction was to wonder whether it wasn't some kind of a gimmick....

Apparently, the company is for real. Founded in 2005, StemLifeLine just received its tissue bank license in May of this year. So, only recently has it begun in earnest its one and only “service” of “developing” and “transforming” unwanted IVF embryos into “useful” stem cells. Such are the idyllic euphemisms employed on the website to smoke screen the reality of the company’s dedication to embryo destruction.

Fr. Berg also discusses how the lines aren't really "personalized" and how 10 embryos might not be enough for parents to create a stem cell line from their embryonic children.

I blogged about this despicable company in May and August.

Life Links 9/10/07

Scott Klusendorf is beginning to blog through Francis Beckwith's Defending Life.


Jill Stanek has a video of piece on Hannity's America regarding Planned Parenthood.


Researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas working on cells from BPH patients have found cells in the prostate which resemble other flexible adult stem cells.

This study on primary stromal cells from BPH patients resulted in findings that prostate stroma cells possess multipotent stem cell markers, strong proliferative potential and the ability to differentiate or transdifferentiate to muscle-forming, fat-forming and bone-forming lineages. These cell preparations may serve as a potential tool for prostate stem cell research and its role on regulation of prostatic hyperplasia.

HT: Life Ethics


Are you kidding me? A link from the Corner. Too bad I didn't notice it until a minute ago.

More from Just Another Alias

From an entry on Friday at See my story, Hear my words (my emphasis):

I think I really believed that I would have an abortion, and then it would just be over, and I would be exactly the same. Or maybe I just didn't really let myself think about it all. Sometimes I feel angry, that nobody warned me, or suggested that this might be so so hard to bare in the aftermath. Had I known, I wonder if I would have thought about it longer. Maybe it's best, that I didn't know until now.

No one told me I might miss something I didn't want. And despite it all, I can't imagine that it would have been better any other way.

Think about this when abortion providers loathe to mention anything about the possible emotional aftereffects of having an abortion besides relief.

Calling 60 Minutes

Researchers in Toronto have used skin cells to treat rats with spinal cord injuries.

Injured rats injected with skin-derived stem cells regained mobility and had better walking co-ordination, according to the study published yesterday in the Journal of Neuroscience. The skin-derived stem cells, injected directly into the injured rats' spinal cords, were able to survive in their new location and set off a flurry of activity, helping to heal the cavity in the cord.

I wonder if this research will get it's own segment on 60 Minutes like Hans Keirstead's research on rodents with spinal cord injuries using embryonic stem cells.

Yeah, probably not.

Tags: stem cell, spinal cord

Fire in the Fertility Clinic again?

Andrew Sullivan posts an e-mail where the writer asserts that human embryos aren't persons. Unfortunately, the writer does this without ever providing any evidence for this assertion or describing which qualities make a human being into a person and why someone should accept his arbitrary qualities over others. The e-mailer then says the problem with the prolife movement is we don't accept "neurological criteria" as a valid reason to discriminate against the unborn. Well, yeah, duh. We wouldn't be prolife would we if we thought it should be legal to kill human beings based on "neurological criteria?" Man, if only we were pro-choice those pro-choicers would agree with us!!

The e-mailer then brings up Ronald Bailey's old fire in the fertility clinic scenario (which Ellen Goodman recycled in 2005) and claims prolifers "twist themselves in knots" trying to answer it. I wonder if Sullivan's e-mailer has actually ever brought this up with a prolifer used to handling such thought experiments and pro-choice arguments. If he had, he might realize this scenario comes nowhere near proving what it purports to prove. Or as Ramesh Ponnuru writes in Party of Death (pg. 89),

"Goodman's question about the burning building scenario doesn't prove the point she thinks it does. Think about another hypothetical situation: You're in a burning building. You can either rescue a research scientist who is making great strides toward a cure for Alzheimer's disease, or rescue four herion-addicted fifty-eight-year-old men who have spent their lives rotating through the penal system and are likely to continue to do so. Whom do you save?

Let's say you save the scientist. Are you therefore saying that it's permissible to kill hopeless old addicts? Are you saying that such people do not have the same right not to be killed that the scientist does? Of course not. Neither Goodman's question nor mine asks you to contemplate killing anyone."

Tags: andrew sullivan, ramesh ponnuru, fertility clinic fire, human embryos

Whose has more social skills: a toddler or a chimp?

According to this article in Time, the toddler wins out.

But when it came to "social learning" tasks — such as understanding how to solve a problem by watching someone else do it, figuring out someone else's state of mind from their actions, or using nonverbal communication to explain or understand how to find something — the kids made monkeys of the apes. In one test, for example, researchers showed both groups how to open up a plastic tube to get at a treat. The children learned by watching, and opened it as the adults did. The apes tended to just chew the tube open. In another, researchers would hide the treat while the test subjects were present. Then the subjects would have to find it, with the only clue being that the scientists would look toward the hiding place. Again, the kids beat the apes soundly.

Mike Huckabee - Pill Snatcher Extraordinare

At least that's what some pro-choice bloggers would have you believe.

Amie Newman has a comical post at the RHReality Check blog claiming birth control pills, IUDs and Plan B "are in danger of being outlawed should" a presidential candidate who believes life begins at conception be elected. I submit you have to be insane or very close to it to actually believe the election of someone like Mike Huckabee in 2008 would put the above contraceptives in danger of being outlawed. For goodness sake, Plan B was approved for over-the-counter sales during President Bush's stay in the White House.

Republicans presidents who are prolife haven't come anywhere near banning abortion so how on earth can a sane individual think it would be possible for a prolife Republican president to ban birth control pills or come anywhere near such a thing? Is there a single presidential candidate or member of congress who has even submitted legislation or has a position in favor of doing such a thing?

Newman also links to this post by Garance Franke-Ruta at the American Prospect blog TAPPED which supposedly "decode(s)" what "life begins at conception" means.

"Life begins at conception" is code for the extremist anti-choice position that wants hormonal birth control pills, the morning after pill, and intrauterine devices to be outlawed as abortion-inducing agents, or "abortifacients." All these methods prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg in a woman's uterus. They prevent pregnancy, but not conception.

Not a single link to any kind of evidence to back up the statement that birth control pills don't prevent conception. Or any statement from any prolife organization saying birth control pills never prevent conception.

What's so sad here is how paranoid and delusional these people are. They can't understand that saying, "life beings at conception" (short for: "the life of an individual human being begins at conception") isn't a code for anything. It's a scientific fact. They don't want to argue whether this statement is true or not (because they lose that argument). They'd prefer to take that statement asserting something as true and make into some kind of wink-wink, nudge-nudge, I'm-going-to-ban-contraceptives, political posturing. I guess it's much easier to create "he wants to ban birth control" strawmen than honestly wrestle with the reality that abortion intentionally ends the life of a developing human being.

In the comments section, some of Garance's readers take exception with her broad generalized statements and she eventually says, "The pill's primary mechanism of action is to prevent ovulation, not implantaion. As I said, there can be break-through ovulation -- as, for example, was experienced by a friend who got pregnant while on the pill. The odds are low but some women are just extremely fertile, it seems."

I like this response from torourke:

This is one of the more unintentionally hilarious items I've read in a while. In other words, "Mike Huckabee definitely opposes some forms of contraception, and his line at the debate was code to the Christo-fascist underground movement that he is really on their side, but then again I have no idea what I am talking about, so yeah, maybe somebody should ask what his position actually is on contraception."

Solid analysis there Garance. Gee, how about looking at his record while he was Governor of Arkansas? Did he support legislation that would restrict the use of any kind of contraception?

Nope.

If you look at his website, he supports run-of-the-mill pro-life positions and the refunding of abstinence education (which I think is a bad idea). But nowhere does he mention that he would like to ban any kind of contraception.

'Life begins at conception' is an utterly banal observation that can found in your average embryology textbook, or is that a coded-message as well?

Tags: amie newman, garance franke-ruta, abortion, contraception, mike huckabee

Source please?

The Washington Post has a long article (the Reuters article can also be found at Yahoo! Asia News) about abortion in the Philippines, where abortion is typically illegal.

Besides being nearly identical to an advocacy piece you'd typically find on Planned Parenthood's website, the article contains a number of estimates (though they're not called estimates) regarding how many women receive abortions in the Philippines and how many women are hospitalized and die from abortion complications. The article claims "health reports" show that nearly "80,000" Filipino women are treated for abortion complication each year. I'm not sure which "health reports" the reporter used but there was an article in the International Family Planning Perspectives from September 1997 which estimates the number of abortion complications in the Philippines in 1994 to be 80,000. The IFPP is Alan Guttmacher's peer-reviewed research journal.

If you read the IFPP article, it's fairly obvious there is a whole lot of estimating going on there. They need to estimate how many women are hospitalized, they need to estimate how many of those hospitalizations were because of miscarriages as opposed to induced abortion, and they need to estimate how many women who have abortions are hospitalized based on their estimates of how many women were hospitalized for abortion complication. The IFFP article notes there would be 480,618 annual abortions per year in the Philippines if 1 in 6 women (one of a couple of estimates) who have abortions are hospitalized. This statistic matches up with the Post article which says "about half a million women end their pregnancies every year" in the Philippines.

If the Alan Guttmacher Institute is the source of the reporter's abortions statistics why is this and the AGI's ties to Planned Parenthood never mentioned in the article? The reporter sources the AGI for her statistics on what family planning method women used. Why can't she do the same thing for her abortion statistics? Should estimates from a leading abortion advocacy organization really be your sole source of information on how many abortions are performed in a country? And if so, shouldn't your readers at least know that these numbers are coming from an organization that advocates in favor of legal abortion?

Tags: Philippines, abortion, alan guttmacher institute

Britain says yes to the creation of cloned hybrid embryos

According to the Times Online, Britain's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has "agreed in principle" to allow scientists to attempt to create cloned hybrid embryos using animal eggs. Within three months they'll decide whether to grant licenses to various researchers who've applied to do this research. Check out this quote from Stephen Minger.

"It has always been our view that the use of non-human oocytes [eggs] for SCNT is currently the only ethically justifiable option, given the large numbers of eggs required to derive cloned human stem cell lines from individuals with incurable and highly progressive neurological disorders."

Did you catch that? Minger and his colleagues have always believed using animal eggs is the only ethical way to clone embryos for stem cells. I wonder if American researchers feel the same way.

Remember the good ol' days when researchers said they just wanted to use embryos who were going to be thrown away.

Gotta love this headline from USA Today. Notice how the word "embryo" is mysteriously missing from the AP article.

Tags: cloning, stem cell, hybrid embryos, Britain

"I know I can't have the baby. I don't really have a choice."

A young woman is scheduled to have an abortion and shares her situation at the Choice to Live With blog.

"You're very emotional about this"

William Harrison, an abortionist in Arkansas, has a recent entry in his blog at Daily Kos which includes an unprinted letter he wrote in 1997 to an editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in response to this column by Paul Greenberg.

In the editorial, Greenberg discusses his recent attendance at a court hearing on a law to ban partial-birth abortion and how bureaucracy plays a role in allowing horrible things to happen to human beings. He mentions the testimony of a former abortionist who compared what she did (and how she was able to do it) with how German doctors were able experimented on Jews during the Holocaust. Greenberg writes,

Label any group Tiermenschen, define them as sub-human, make them unpersons, declare them chattel, and they can be disposed of without qualm.

Harrison took exception with this comparison in his letter, claiming Greenberg should not compare the abortions Harrison undertakes on a daily basis with the Holocaust because the unborn child in the first two trimesters can't feel pain and various emotions. Harrison writes,

The very thought of unremitting terror and the anticipation of enduring what must have seemed an eternity of cold, exhaustion, humiliation, hunger, thirst and withering pain, unrelieved and inexorable, is a horror that no embryo or fetus can ever experience, but which the Holocaust victims lived with for hours to years.

Harrison seems completely unable to understand that he is justifying the killings he commits by making the unborn into non-persons unworthy of protection using arbitrary criteria (many of which numerous born humans don't meet). His defense of his actions almost proves Greenberg's point. They can't experience the same pain and emotions the victims of the Holocaust endured (and are therefore sub-human or non-persons) so Harrison feels his daily work of killing the unborn can't be compared to the Holocaust.

Harrison can't wrap his mind around the reality of why some prolife people compare legal abortion with the Holocaust. It's not about the pain or emotions most aborted unborn children never feel. It's about the intentional killing of an unfathomably massive number of human beings and how it is accomplished by dehumanizing them.

Tags: william harrison, abortion, paul greenberg

Another Planned Parenthood getting sued

From the Lincoln (Nebraska) Star Journal:

A 40-year-old Nebraska woman said in a lawsuit filed Friday that she had an emergency hysterectomy because of a botched abortion at the Planned Parenthood clinic in Lincoln last month....

The lawsuit names as defendants Planned Parenthood of Nebraska and Council Bluffs and Dr. Meryl Severson of Omaha....

A signed operative report from a physician at the hospital said the woman had experienced a "catastrophic perforation" of the uterus during the abortion. Downing provided a copy of the report in which the doctor's name was blacked out.

Because of the "extensive nature of the trauma," the report said, the physician summoned a second doctor and they performed an emergency hysterectomy on the woman. The doctors took photographs of the uterus to show the damage, according to the lawsuit.

"Had she not received emergency care when she did, it is my professional opinion that the patient could have hemorrhaged to death," the doctor said in a signed summary provided by Downing.

Life Links 9/4/07

Britain's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is expected to give the okay for British researchers to attempt to create human-animal hybrid embryos sometime tomorrow. Researchers hope to create this hybrid embryos and then kill them for their stem cells. HFEA reports claim the majority of the public support this research but I'm wondering what "factual information" was given to poll respondents to make them less hesitant.

The consultation, a £150,000, three-month mix of opinion polls, public meetings and debates, found participants were initially cautious of merging animal and human material, but became more positive. "When further factual information was provided and further discussion took place, the majority of participants became more at ease with the idea," the HFEA's report says.

A girl from Missouri has had her blindness (optic nerve hypoplasia) in China with umbilical cord blood. The multi-part article notes the girl has supposedly seen some improvement responding to light and has 20/400 vision. The cost of the trip and treatment was $40,000.


Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have discovered unique stem cells in human blood vessels which could possible be used to treat muscle injuries.

In a study using human muscle tissue, scientists in Children's Stem Cell Research Center - led by Johnny Huard, PhD, and Bruno Péault, PhD - isolated and characterized stem cells taken from blood vessels (known as myoendothelial cells) that are easily isolated using cell-sorting techniques, proliferate rapidly and can be differentiated in the laboratory into muscle, bone and cartilage cells.