Meanwhile, those of us in the abortion-rights movement have barely changed our approach. We cling to the arguments that led to victory in Roe v. Wade. Abortion is a private decision, we say, and the state has no power over a woman's body. Those arguments may have worked in the 1970s, but today, they are failing us, and focusing on them only risks us all the gains we've made.....
We can no longer pretend the fetus is invisible. We can no longer seek to banish the state from our lives, but rather need to engage its power to improve women's lives....
The fetus is more visible than ever before, and the abortion-rights movement needs to accept its existence and its value. It may not have a right to life, and its value may not be equal to that of the pregnant woman, but ending the life of a fetus is not a morally insignificant event....
We need to firmly and clearly reject post-viability abortions except in the most extreme cases.....
If the choice movement does not change, control of policy on abortion will remain in the hands of those who want it criminalized. If we don't suggest sensible balanced legislation and regulation of abortion, we will be left with far more draconian policies - and, eventually, no choices at all.
Friday, February 18, 2011
Overheard - Pro-choice leader says pro-choice arguments are "failing us"
Former leader of Catholics for Choice, Frances Kissling in the Washington Post today:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment