NARAL has posted this "spin/truth" comparison sheet in an effort to defend their commercial. As usual with NARAL "fact" sheets, it is long on fluff and dubious assertions and short on any kind of logical fact-based argument. From their skewed perspective only the 'right' and 'conservatives' think their ad is misleading.
Radical groups appealed these cases and found an ally in John Roberts. This wasn't an arcane legal dispute, but a fight over whether or not law enforcement could use their most effective weapon against extremists who use violence.....
Roberts' sided with a convicted bomber and other activists who preach violence.....
Far-Right Spin #4: Papers released last week show Roberts opposed clinic violence.
FACT: The legal strategy Roberts crafted speaks much louder than a draft of a letter written for a superior......
Another odd group of accusations considering that NARAL President Nancy Keenan said, "I want to be very clear that we are not suggesting Mr. Roberts condones or supports clinic violence."
So what's the true verdict? Does Roberts oppose violence or not? What are you suggesting then? That he likes violent people?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment