From Early Options, which has abortion clinics in Brooklyn and Manhattan:
It might also help you to know that if you are in the early stages of pregnancy, there is no embryo. In fact, if it has been less than 7 weeks since your last period, your pregnancy consists of nothing visible to the eye except a tiny, empty sac in your uterus.
If you are early enough to take the pill, it is unlikely you would see an embryo – it is not yet formed.
And pro-choice people think informed consent laws aren't necessary? If there is no embryo then what is the abortionist removing? If the sac is empty then why have an abortion?
These blatant liars can't even get their lies straight. In one case, "there is no embryo" and then in the other case, it's unlikely the embryo would be seen because it isn't formed yet. So is the embryo there or not? Does this mean that the embryo is in the process of "forming?" If the embryo is forming it would have to exist, wouldn't it?
The aspiration procedure is a simple, natural procedure to end an early pregnancy.
There's nothing natural about induced abortion.
In the United States, it was practiced in the 1970's by the Women's Health movement. It was called "Menstrual Extraction." It is so simple that women used to do it on each other in their own homes!
Why is there an exclamation point there? Is Early Options excited about untrained women performing abortions on each other in a place where there are no medical resources in case of a complication? If it is "so simple" then why are you charging $500 for them?
Their information on RU-486 or "medical abortion" also shows the complete disregard that abortion clinics have for the FDA medication guide for RU-486.
They provide the pills to women up to 63 days into pregnancy not 49 days. They give the second round of pills for the woman to take at home instead of at the provider's office.
HT: S.I.C.L.E. Cell