John Derbyshire is wondering what prolifers think about one blogger’s contention that abortion is “pro-family” because he believes abortions reduce the number of single-mother families (he likely hasn’t looked for any historical proof of this).
Let’s consider another way we could reduce the number of single-mother families: killing the born children of single mothers.
Would that be pro-family?
Of course not because killing off some family members is not a proper means of strengthening families.
What is it with some pro-choicers like Derbyshire and their complete inability to think for a minute about how prolife people view unborn children? It baffles me.