tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737469.post6078169946154877324..comments2023-09-22T05:06:09.647-07:00Comments on JivinJehoshaphat: Abortionist Richard Grossman needs to retake 8th grade biologyJivin Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06437784306957426634noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8737469.post-74755139002774927462010-10-25T10:35:38.463-07:002010-10-25T10:35:38.463-07:00What Dr. Grossman has said about Amendment 62 is p...What Dr. Grossman has said about Amendment 62 is pathetic, and in no way should his absurd “view” be tolerated, especially by his professional associations. If Dr. Grossman does not know the difference between an “egg” and a newly reproduced single-cell human being/organism, one wonders how he ever passed his Med. boards. Such quackery should immediately be addressed and corrected publicly by his medical association and peers before such scientific falsehoods cause even more corrosion of the credibility of medical professionals.<br /><br />Dr. Grossman is factually and scientifically incorrect to claim that Amendment 62 would result in doctors being punished for removing a diseased ovary. Neither the ovary nor the eggs within it are human beings. Further, an egg is an egg; a sperm is a sperm – these are just “cells” that are parts of one whole more mature human being. Neither a sperm or an egg is a human being. Note that only “23” chromosomes from each are incorporated into a new human embryo, but that new human embryo now contains “46” chromosomes”. Seems that Dr. Grossman can’t even add. Once a sperm penetrates an egg, then a substantial change takes place resulting in a new human BEING, a single-cell ORGANISM, that produces specifically HUMAN proteins and enzymes (not sperm or egg proteins and enzymes!), and that continuously grows and develops into a more mature human being. If an egg or a sperm were implanted into a woman’s womb, there is absolutely no way that either could develop into a human being.<br /><br />Dr. Grossman should stop playing “egg” politics-as-usual and worry more about his patients’ health, well-being, and the scientific accuracy of the information he is providing them. If he provides the same kind of false “information” to his patients who come to him for an abortion, then he has grossly deceived them and precluded them from giving truly legally valid informed consent before they sign those consent forms. Enough “egg” politics, Dr. Grossman.<br /><br />Dr. Dianne N. Irving, M.A., Ph.D.Dianne N. Irving, Ph.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15135407175335469447noreply@blogger.com